Transparency Report

The organisation that holds others accountable must be visibly accountable itself.

First reporting period: 2026. Framework published July 2026.

What we will report, and how it is calculated

EOSYN Space has not yet completed a full reporting year, so there are no audited financial figures to publish. Rather than print estimates, we are publishing the definitions in advance — so the numbers can be checked against a standard we set before we knew what they would say.

Total revenue
Not yet published
All income received, broken down by donations, grants, and partnerships.
Due: With the first audited statements
Total expenditure
Not yet published
All money spent, broken down by programme, operations, and fundraising.
Due: With the first audited statements
Programme vs. operations
Not yet published
Programme spend as a percentage of total expenditure.
Due: With the first audited statements
Cost per participant
Not yet published
Total programme cost divided by the number of participants reached.
Due: With the first audited statements

No figure on this page is an estimate, a projection, or a placeholder. A number appears here only once it comes from audited statements signed off by the Treasurer and the Chair of the Board.

Last updated: July 2026

Next update: October 2026

Digital Environmental Footprint

This section is not optional and will appear in every report we publish. The website carbon figures below are measured from the actual bytes each page transfers and converted with the Sustainable Web Design v4 model, not estimated from an industry average.

Website carbon footprint
Monthly mean gCO2e per page view across all public pages, measured per page view and audited per release. Budget: 0.2 g.
Measured continuously; first monthly mean publishes with the first report
Hosting energy source
Green Web Foundation verification status for every infrastructure layer. Currently 3 of 5 layers verified green; the rest are counted at grid average and targeted for migration by Q2 2027.
Published and dated on the digital footprint page
Total annual data transfer
Page views multiplied by measured per-page transfer size, aggregated over the reporting year in gigabytes.
Requires a full year of analytics; first figure with the first report
Year-on-year trend
Change in mean gCO2e per page view and in total annual transfer against the previous reporting year.
First comparison possible in the second reporting year

Carbon-aware traffic routing — sending visitors through whichever region has the cleanest grid at that moment — is not supported by our current delivery stack. It is a Phase II commitment targeted at Q2 2027.

Full method, per-layer hosting verification and the limitations of these figures: Digital Environmental Footprint.

Software Transparency

We ask aerospace employers to publish data they would rather keep private, so we publish ours. Every third-party software component this site depends on — direct and transitive, with exact versions and licences — is listed in a machine-readable Software Bill of Materials, regenerated on every release.

Software Bill of Materials (CycloneDX, JSON)

Known vulnerabilities are checked against this inventory weekly and on every change. A critical or high-severity finding blocks release; it is not carried into production and reported later.

Getting the report

There is no transparency report PDF yet, because there is no completed reporting year yet. When the first one is published it will be linked here, and sent to anyone who asks — donor or not, without asking why.

Ask to be told when it is published →

What’s in the report

Executive Summary
Financial Summary — revenue, expenditure, programme vs. operations allocation, cost per beneficiary
Programme Outcomes vs. Targets
Governance Changes — board composition, conflict-of-interest disclosures
Safeguarding Report — number of concerns reported, anonymised
Accessibility Audit Results
Data Protection — data subject requests, complaints, breaches if any
Donor Ethics Report — donations declined, donor concentration risk
Environmental Footprint — website carbon footprint, hosting energy source
Independent Verification — external auditor statement

All charts in this report use the EOSYN Space colour palette, include data source citations, and are accessible (alt text, data table fallback). No vanity metrics — every metric is defensible.

What we publish, every year, without exception

Total income, split by donations, grants, and partner contributions.
Every institutional funder and partner by name — including the ones whose environmental record we criticise elsewhere on this site.
Programme spend against administration and fundraising spend.
Outcomes by programme, including the cohorts that underperformed and our reading of why.
Anonymised safeguarding figures: concerns raised, concerns referred to statutory authorities, and outcomes.
Our own carbon footprint, including programme travel and digital infrastructure.

Funding we have declined

We publish the number of funding offers declined each year and the category of reason — conflict with our accountability work, conditions attached to research, or a request for influence over participant selection. We do not name the organisation, because a refusal is not a finding of wrongdoing, but we do publish that it happened.

Independence of our research

No funder or partner sees our research before publication. Not a courtesy read, not a heads-up call, not a chance to comment. This is a condition of funding rather than a policy we could quietly drop.

This website’s footprint

We hold this site to under 0.2 grams of CO₂ per page view: fonts served locally, no video autoplay, no tracking scripts, images served at the size they are displayed, and a hard limit of three third-party scripts per page. The measured figures, the energy source of each hosting layer, and the layers we cannot yet call green are published in full on our digital environmental footprint page.

Request the full statements

Email hello@eosynspace.org for the audited financial statements of EOSYN Space VZW/ASBL.